The Magicians on paper & screen


Among all the genre TV coming our way The Magicians might be the show that makes me happy the most. It’s a sign of SyFy’s resurgence I can watch – Expanse is reportedly great, but I still have to read the books. And I might do that soon, because after listening to Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy’s episode 180, I’m pretty fired up for the series. Listen to it, or at least read the summary.

Today’s show’s source material, The Magicians Trilogy by Lev Grossman, published 2009-14, was not an easy read by I enjoyed it immensely. So much that I invested in this beautiful boxed edition:

And it was even reviewed by me in the very first post on this blog. In Polish. So now – international edition followed by a few thought on the series.

Harvard, Yale, NYT, Wired, Wall Street Journal… our author polished his skills in quite a few distinguished places. And he doesn’t hide that fact. I remember hearing one podcaster with community college background that he felt rather overwhelmed by Grossman. My initial impressions of the books themselves – cold style, slightly pretentious. Technically faultless, very sophisticated, maybe too many references and allusions. First attempt, during long bus travel, was unsuccessful and I gave up. But it was somewhere on the list of books I want to get back to and when the third instalment got published I tried again. I got used to Grossman’s style quickly this time and read the entire trilogy at once.

In the first novel we meet Quentin Coldwater, a brilliant but socially and emotionally inept teenager from contemporary New York. Who gets to Brakebills, a secretive college for… magicians, of course, hence the title 😉 We got our secret magicial community, student life, parties, relationships, parents who do not understand, in a world that does not forgive innocence and easiness. And we get Fillory, magical parallel world taken from our protagonist’s favourite children books. That contrary to popular belief are proven to be non fiction. Oh, and we have at least two strong female characters. Playing significant role and both more competent and likeable than Quentin.

The Magiocians are often called “Harry Potter for adults”. That is not without merit, but I’d say it’s rather a crossover of Potter and Narnia for blasé highschoolers. But good. And volumes 2&3 do not really have that much from Potter,  more from perversely reinterpreted Narnia. And we are constantly reminded that both the author and most protagonists had read Tolkien, Pratchett, T.H. White… It’s definitely a post-modern fantasy artfully playing with tropes. Sometimes it’s being criticized as an empty shell with nothing significant under all the references. I disagree. For me it’s a gem for genre lovers, I’ve read most of the books influencing Grossman here and I enjoy the game.

But it’s not a surprise that Grossman is an enthusiast of fanfiction.

Ok, so what we have here is neither typical urban fantasy nor stand-offish experiment of an overeducated fanboy. For me it’s fantasy psychologically and sociologically realistic. Our world collides with a parallel reality of magic and the result is not a fairy tale. Magic does not automatically give you happiness, you still have to work for it. It does not solve your problems. Overconfident protagonists suffer and learn their hard lessons. And that makes it possible to like them, in the end, even Quentin, who definitely starts as a jerk. I couldn’t stand him in the first chapters, it’s hard to argue with one of Goodreads reviewers: ‘The story of a quasi-sociopathic high school cretin who mouth-breathes his way into an exclusive fantasy club of hedonistic wizards’. But he grows up and gets smarts. Which is often the hero’s most important quest in good literature.

I have a feeling that magic, should it be introduced to our society, would look something like what we find in Grossman. And I’m happy it’s unlikely to happen.

The best of three is, for me, the final tome. And I don’t mind the ending. It’s… satisfying. I’m not a big fan of ending like this one, but here it fits. But I won’t spoil it.

Two of my favourite quotes:

Genuinely social people never ceased to amaze him. Their brains seemed to generate an inexhaustible fund of things to say , naturally, with no effort, out of nothing at all.

  • The Magician King

This wasn’t Tolkien — these weren’t orcs and trolls and giant spiders and whatever else, evil creatures that you were free to commit genocide on without any complicated moral ramifications.

Orcs didn’t have wives and kids and backstories.

  • The Magician’s Land

Score (1-10): The Magicians 7,5; The Magician King 7,5; The Magician’s Land 8


TV series is, as it has to be, more accessible. It sometimes has the air of YA drama. The sets are great, I have no quarrels with the casting, I especially like the dean, but our young protagonists are also great. With possible exception of Alice who is kind of too hot 😉 Not – for a smart decisive girl. In comparison to book-Alice. But I guess that’s how the TV works… a bit like this show about ugly girl that just needed to change hairdo and glasses and magically became a beauty.


The characters are older than in the books, Brakebills is a post-graduate school not college, but that is not a problem so far. Also there are some major plot shifts. Not changes, but we can observe some stuff that in books we learn much later on. As Grossman wrote:

The answer to all of this is basically, because of TV. It’s a different medium, and you tell stories differently there. Not everything translates directly.

He’s right.

I don’t want to overanalyse the show at this point. But I enjoy it, I’ll watch it all and I’m optimistic about the quality of the rest of the episodes.

In conclusion… it doesn’t matter whether you start with the books or the show. This kind of literature can be enjoyed even if you know how it ends 😉 But give one of the two a shot.

8 thoughts on “The Magicians on paper & screen

  1. Hmm, Magicians… They’re on my TBR list, but far, I’m afraid. I just can’t force myself to read it… Piotrek praised it many times and I believe him, but the premise… Well, I will give it a chance one day. I’ll definitely see the Expanse though – the first book in the series was something I really enjoyed. And they’re back on track with the fifth, so hey! All’s good 🙂


  2. Pingback: Lev Grossman, The Magicians Trilogy (2009-2014) | Re-enchantment Of The World

  3. All right I’ve finally finished The Magicians – and I have really mixed feelings. First, there’s maybe – but just maybe – one character I like, and it’s not the protagonist, who’s a totally spoiled jerk. Nor does she live to the end 😛
    Second, the cross of Narnia and Beverly Hills 90210 is almost impossible to digest. I was never a diehard Narnia-above-all fan. But what Grossman does to the idea of Narnia is, at least for me, insulting. It’s as if he couldn’t let one imaginary land remain pure and innocent, he just had to spoil it, gleefully fondling his dick while pissing.
    Third, that guy knows how to write. Yes, he’s an pretentious showoff with an overblown ego and a firm belief in his own greatness. But there is not one technical fault in this book, and he knows the field of fantasy pretty well. The novel itself is engaging, the action flows fluidly without one hitch, and even if I don’t agree with certain characters’ choices it’s a personal thing and not an inconsistency in the novel’s logic. All the hung rifles from the act one fire in the act three, all loose ends are tied, i’s dotted and t’s crossed.
    But all this technical prowess seems a bit wasted to me – on a shiny bauble without depth. Oh, poor young rich talented adults, so lost and unhappy in their lives. What can they do if not drink themselves to death on a 1000$-a-bottle whisky and fancy wine? Well, they can always go to an imaginary land and wait for a miracle to pull their assess out of their heads.
    Maybe it will get better in the next installments. I am willing to give them a chance – after all, those books read pretty damn well. But after the first installment I don’t have much hope for depth or even a lot of sense.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. piotrek

      It’s curious how we judge some things to be annoying in some books only not to be bothered at all while reading something else. In Magicians I don’t mind the protagonist being a jerk. I kind of feel sorry for him. I’ve never been as smart, but I sympathise with some of his insecurities and sentiments and there is some connection… anyway, in this book I didn’t expect to fully like anybody (but character I liked the most is probably the same you do).

      But I suspect there is way stronger a connection between Quentin and the author, who is an over-educated snob in every possible, good or bad, way, or at least gives this impression in every interview and every piece of writing.

      Anyway, for me it read like a kind of realistic Hogwarts for young adults, the Brakebills part anyway. And all in all, I liked the entire triolgy a lot.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. All right. Following a recent discussion I decided to give The Magicians a second chance and read the second part of the trilogy. The Magician King was for me only marginally better than the first installment (say, 6,5/10), but at least I found a key to interpreting it that makes sense 😉 I think it’s sort of exorcism, a homeopathic therapy where the cure is simply the poison, only in smaller doses. Like you said, I see the author in the protagonist, an insecure know-it-all, a smart ass with a mix of inferiority and superiority complexes. Sure, the quest to know-thyself is the most important of all, but does it have to be in a twisted, alternate Narnia? The conclusion to the second installment, Quentin’s “sacrifice”, didn’t strike me as probable or realistic, and the groundwork for it felt decidedly insufficient. And one last thing, it seems that every girl with a bit of backbone ends badly in those novels 😛 How’s that for gender equality? 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

          1. The problem is that I’m not sure I want to anymore! Grossman managed to thoroughly discourage me to read anything else of his 😛 And even the promise of an ending to this trilogy might be not enough…


  4. Pingback: Henry H. Neff, The Tapestry (2007-2014) | Re-enchantment Of The World

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s